Call of duty Black Ops vs Modern Warfare 3

[DerBear]

Currently call of duty black ops is the latest COD by Trayarc and Modern warfare 3 is the latest from infinity ward

So what do you think is the best overall? MW3 or black ops?

I think Black ops has got to be one of the worst call of duty games-apart from the zombies, I loved that part, but like after 1 prestige Blackops was just complete shit, I mean, It was always the same and you never had to work to get your weapons because of the COD points system, then you had the emblem maker whitch was fun until people started taking this complete piss out of it by having guys wanking and women fisting themselves. Then you had all the restrictions they had on guns like Warlord you could not attach an underbarrel, so that became really shit, everyone used either ghost or flat jacket whitch both were over powered like fuck. So Black ops to me was good for awhile but not something I like playing a lot.

Modern Warfare 3 has to be one of the CODs I like not my most liked but it was one of the ones I enjoyed, while the perk system has its flaws the guns are good with added sway and recoil is up on most guns, weapon attachments and perks were all good and balanced, Maps are a little on the small side, not great for snipers but overall was very good to play on.

So I prefer Modern warfare 3 to black ops

What do you guys prefer

[Auzzie 94]

MW3 by far, this is my list of best to worst CoD's ever.
Best - CoD: Modern Warfare, CoD: Modern Warfare 3, CoD: Black Ops, CoD: World at War, CoD: Modern Warfare 2. I'll edit this eventually and go into further detail on why.

[CheeseChaser]

I like them both but prefer Modern Warfare 3.

[DerBear]

MW3 by far, this is my list of best to worst CoD's ever.
Best - CoD: Modern Warfare, CoD: Modern Warfare 3, CoD: Black Ops, CoD: World at War, CoD: Modern Warfare 2. I'll edit this eventually and go into further detail on why.

I am rather suprised, at this, most like WAW and modern warfare 2. I will be intrested to see when you go into more detail

[mattbenn08]

i prefer black ops just because i used to spend alot of time on my ps3 when black ops came out so i got into it but with mw3 i havent really got into it. and i LOVE zombies :P

[Rayquaza]

Tricky one. I did prefer MW3, although I spent much more time playing Black Ops, purely for the fact it had Zombies.

[DerBear]

I find that black ops also had and tried to do a modern spin on what the actual game time period it was set in, like mw series has always stuck with its time zone of techology where as black ops was set during and after vietnam and they had things that were not ment for our time frame, it was and is seriosuly fucked up like.

[Auzzie 94]

MW3 by far, this is my list of best to worst CoD's ever.
Best - CoD: Modern Warfare, CoD: Modern Warfare 3, CoD: Black Ops, CoD: World at War, CoD: Modern Warfare 2. I'll edit this eventually and go into further detail on why.

I will now elaborate on this.

Basically I think CoD: MW (A.K.A CoD 4) is the best CoD so far because it is an all around great game the multiplayer (online) is superb and the campaign was a little predictable but was not boring and I liked some of the stealthier missions in it which is what I think all of the other games in the Call of Duty series have lacked. The mission where you are playing as Captain Price (who was a Luitenant back then) and you are sneaking around in Pripyat, Ukraine with Price's partner Captain McMillan is and always will be my favourite mission on any Call of Duty Campaign. I LOVE that mission. The objective is to sneak through Pripyat undetected using stealth (Ghillie suits and suppressed snipers) assassinate Imran Zakhaev and escape. The other Call of Duty games in the series lacked a good stealthy mission like this one. I loved all of the guns in the CoD 4 multiplayer as well as the perks and I also loved the pre-set and unchangeable killstreaks (UAV, Airstrike and Attack Chopper), I loved these three killstreaks as they were simple and fairly easy to earn if you are a good/experienced player and also it made the game very fair since everyone has the same killstreaks. The playable maps in the CoD 4 multiplayer were awesome maps and they should really bring them all back in a new massive map pack for MW3, that would be sweet as.

I like CoD: MW3 since the red dot sights on guns are very similar to the CoD 4 ones and the guns available in multiplayer are awesome guns. The perks are pretty awesome, I also like the wide variety of point streaks (killstreaks). I love the Support point streaks as well as the Sssault ones but the Specialist ones are my favourite because they level you up so fast. The maps on MW3 are awesome but I am not really a big fan of this Call of Duty ELITE crap.. I have it since I pre-ordered the hardened edition of the game and I didn't even bother activating it, it seems stupid and I am really a fan of simple gaming.. no strategies and no help from other technology... I play the game as I go.. I don't have planned routes or paths to follow in the multiplayer and I still get awesome scores. The campaign in MW3 was pretty cool, I really enjoyed it, it wasn't that predictable but MW3 kind of reminds me of CoD 4 (in terms of the graphics and the campaign) but it seems like a new and upgraded version of CoD 4. I am glad they brought a similar thing to the MW2 "Nuke" back to MW3, it is called a M.O.A.B and it isn't an assignable killstreak it is just always there.. you get one at 25 kills just like the Nuke and it does NOT end the game like a Nuke did on MW2. The Mother of All Bombs killstreak (M.O.A.B) will just blow everyone on the enemy team up (as well as the person who called in the M.O.A.B) and after the M.O.A.B has been detonated the team who got the M.O.A.B get's double xp for the rest of the match! I LOVE IT!

I loved Black Ops as well... Zombies was sooooooo fun on Black Ops, Zombies on Black Ops was more mysterious and fun to play than on CoD: WaW, but I still liked WaW Zombies. Black Ops campaign was different but in a good way since you are kind of playing missions that Mason had done and you play them as he is questioned about them by his unknown capturers (at the end you find out who they are). The missions were all fun and pretty awesome especially the one when you are in Vietnam I think it is and you have to go through the rat tunnels, it was fun. The multiplayer was good all around and the guns were pretty awesome, as were the perks. The playlists had the same boring gametypes so I wasn't that impressed but the killstreaks were something new (RC-XD car was fun as!). Theatre Mode was introduced in this game and I thought it was awesome, I had so many great clips in my File Share (now known as "Vault" on MW3). I really enjoyed playing Black Ops all together.

I liked CoD: WaW because of Zombies mostly, I started playing Zombies in WaW and when Black Ops came out I was so excited to see that Treyarch put Zombies into it and I was so excited and they definitely didn't disapoint me at all by doing so. The guns in multiplayer on WaW I didn't really like, but they were ok, again I loved the preset killstreaks. The maps for multiplayer I didn't like as much as the other games they were kind of boring imo. The campaign on WaW was pretty boring since it was about WWII and wasn't really realistic and didn't follow many real life events of WWII and the events it did follow were the boring ones but still it was okay even though it was a kind of predictable campaign.

My feelings about CoD: MW2 can be expressed with only two words, WORST GAME. I hated everything about it.. the campaign was so predictable and was pretty stupid imo, the only part of the campaign I liked was the last mission I think.. when you chuck a knife into Shepherd's eye/face, the fight scene between Shepherd and Price is epic but isn't as epic as the interactive fight scene between Price and Makarov in MW3, now that was epic and shat all over the fight scene in MW2. The multiplayer really was a big let down, I expected it to be awesome except it was far from awesome... the ability to replenish Claymores and C4s with Scavenger was ridiculous and pissed me off so much because it promoted camping. I hated all of the noob tubers and try hard zzirGrizz quickscopers online, the Intervention was a crap sniper rifle and I wish they had have brought back the M40A3 from CoD 4. I hated the killstreaks on MW2, the Nuke in the MW2 multiplayer was so annoying.. you could be going so good in a game and be on your way to getting like your 2nd or 3rd AC-130 killstreak then all of a sudden some dog on the other team gets a Nuke and calls it in and the game ends prematurely, now that would REALLY piss me off. The maps were crap except the ones that they brought back from CoD 4.

[Wesley1369]

i play all call of duty games A LOT
and honestly black ops was sick but the maps sucked online.
MW3 is hands down a better game than black ops. better maps and just all around better online play

[Djentleman]

COD for the Story and Zombies. That's it.

[Wesley1369]

online play is where its at

[Bubbawhack]

Personally I perfer Halo and bf3
I I had to choose, I would pick MW3 because there is the infected mode... But then again zombies is pretty good...'

Actually. My favorite is cod4

[Wesley1369]

zombies is awesome for sure, but since i love online play more than anything by far it was tough for me to get into black ops because the majority of those maps were awful. MW3 has great maps. but honestly i think modern warfare 2 had really great maps too

[project_icarus]

MW3 wins hands down, for me.

[Azunite]

(So sorry, wrong thread)

[Rdsxbaseballfan]

im the complete opposite as you, i do not totally hate mw3 as the worst but its high on the worst list. i actually enjoyed black ops and thought it was one of the best COD games so far. and i think treyarch is a better company than infinity ward

[DerBear]

im the complete opposite as you, i do not totally hate mw3 as the worst but its high on the worst list. i actually enjoyed black ops and thought it was one of the best COD games so far. and i think treyarch is a better company than infinity ward

Why though? The graphics for black ops were horrible, and the game just seemed more, I dunno boring like you got your cod points bought what you needed went into game and then played and after 5 prestiges the game could put one to sleep

[Djentleman]

Why though? The graphics for black ops were horrible, and the game just seemed more, I dunno boring like you got your cod points bought what you needed went into game and then played and after 5 prestiges the game could put one to sleep

The point system was a bit stupid. The challenge of unlocking things is where it's at, but BO's isn't that bad in terms of graphics and gameplay. Needless to say, it does get tediously repetitive.

[Rdsxbaseballfan]

Why though? The graphics for black ops were horrible, and the game just seemed more, I dunno boring like you got your cod points bought what you needed went into game and then played and after 5 prestiges the game could put one to sleep
well its your opinions, i enjoyed both the campaign and online because i loved the multiplayer maps as well as all the map packs. MW3 is ok but im just not a big fan of the maps, theres only like 2 or 3 that i liked of the original maps but i do like piazza and overwatch.
MW3 has a great story and i have followed it since mw but the only good multiplayer from infinity ward was mw2. But its just something about treyarch that i like. it seems like i always enjoy games from treyarch over infinity ward. yeah people complain about all the problems of black ops but i never experienced anything that would effect my multiplayer experience.
In mw3 im constantly getting spawned trapped or spawned into a shotgun bullet and that never happens to me on black ops.
and you say it had bad graphics? well i thought they were great and the story of black ops was just as great as the mw series
and for the point system i thought it was a good idea. its kindve like mw2 just add the cod points. you still have to unlock the weapons and perks and stuff you just need to go a bit farther and buy them with your cod points. i loved the wager matches because it was something new and they were really fun. treyarch tries new things which is why i like them

[DerBear]

well its your opinions, i enjoyed both the campaign and online because i loved the multiplayer maps as well as all the map packs. MW3 is ok but im just not a big fan of the maps, theres only like 2 or 3 that i liked of the original maps but i do like piazza and overwatch.
MW3 has a great story and i have followed it since mw but the only good multiplayer from infinity ward was mw2. But its just something about treyarch that i like. it seems like i always enjoy games from treyarch over infinity ward. yeah people complain about all the problems of black ops but i never experienced anything that would effect my multiplayer experience.
In mw3 im constantly getting spawned trapped or spawned into a shotgun bullet and that never happens to me on black ops.
and you say it had bad graphics? well i thought they were great and the story of black ops was just as great as the mw series
and for the point system i thought it was a good idea. its kindve like mw2 just add the cod points. you still have to unlock the weapons and perks and stuff you just need to go a bit farther and buy them with your cod points. i loved the wager matches because it was something new and they were really fun. treyarch tries new things which is why i like them

The story was F****** up, it was about a guy who was brain washed into killing these guys who made nova six and then you have to save the world. The Graphics looked like blobs of tirangles being formed to make all the hills and overall the writting on the multiplayer was hard to read as it looked thin and pixeled.

The zombies was great in black ops, yet there was no place to sit down if you need to hold out against the zombies like all the previous maps had, example natch der unton had upstairs zombie asylum had the balcony, der rise had the catwalk, but none of them except the first map pack cod had anywhere to camp if you need too.

a part from bad spawning and lag comp, MW3 graphics are great, the gameplay is smooth, and the guns are balanced, the ADS time is slower and quickdraw is in amognst a few of the best perks.

Overall I prefer MW3

[Rdsxbaseballfan]

The story was F****** up, it was about a guy who was brain washed into killing these guys who made nova six and then you have to save the world. The Graphics looked like blobs of tirangles being formed to make all the hills and overall the writting on the multiplayer was hard to read as it looked thin and pixeled.

The zombies was great in black ops, yet there was no place to sit down if you need to hold out against the zombies like all the previous maps had, example natch der unton had upstairs zombie asylum had the balcony, der rise had the catwalk, but none of them except the first map pack cod had anywhere to camp if you need too.

a part from bad spawning and lag comp, MW3 graphics are great, the gameplay is smooth, and the guns are balanced, the ADS time is slower and quickdraw is in amognst a few of the best perks.

Overall I prefer MW3

The story had creativity in it and was very interesting.
as i said, its your opinion, but to me black ops was better and graphics dont make the game but the graphics didnt even look bad in black ops i thought it was good. i wasnt much of a zombie fan so i dont now about the zombies part but it hought the multiplayer was amazing and much better than that of mw3. not all weapons are balanced. i get shot from a shotgun from across the map in mw3

[DerBear]

The story had creativity in it and was very interesting.
as i said, its your opinion, but to me black ops was better and graphics dont make the game but the graphics didnt even look bad in black ops i thought it was good. i wasnt much of a zombie fan so i dont now about the zombies part but it hought the multiplayer was amazing and much better than that of mw3. not all weapons are balanced. i get shot from a shotgun from across the map in mw3

Well in MW3 the shotguns are more relaistic, I mean from what I have seen shotguns can reach a couple meters away, and with range this also increases it.

I think a game is 50% graphics, 25% story and 25% online if the graphics are bad, I dislike playing the game because to me, whats the fun of playing a game that does not look realistic or good. The story was creative but then again it was also really bad because there was no character development other than learning MASON had been brain washed, in the MW series you got to learn who everyone was, e.g soap and price. Everyone died a part from 3 characters in the game and 2 out of the 3 were boring, you never felt like you were involved in the game.

Multi was okay but it was boring due to the cod points as you earned a good amount of cod points per game and once you bought the weaoin that was you done, nothing, you could not even use warlord that good because you could not have any underbarrel attachment so that left what? a sight, silencer, or mag, thats it....

Secondary weapons were crap compared to MW2, in MW2 YOU HAD LOADS TO CHOOSE FROM, sure thumper and rockets were spamed but still you got a good selcetion.

Snipers in black ops were horrible for over half a year, because in nerfing quickscoping they nerfed sniping all together.

Assault rifles were all the same and little change with them, no recoil, high rate of fire, ect

Overall the zombies is the only reason I kept the game.

[Rdsxbaseballfan]

Well in MW3 the shotguns are more relaistic, I mean from what I have seen shotguns can reach a couple meters away, and with range this also increases it.

I think a game is 50% graphics, 25% story and 25% online if the graphics are bad, I dislike playing the game because to me, whats the fun of playing a game that does not look realistic or good. The story was creative but then again it was also really bad because there was no character development other than learning MASON had been brain washed, in the MW series you got to learn who everyone was, e.g soap and price. Everyone died a part from 3 characters in the game and 2 out of the 3 were boring, you never felt like you were involved in the game.

Multi was okay but it was boring due to the cod points as you earned a good amount of cod points per game and once you bought the weaoin that was you done, nothing, you could not even use warlord that good because you could not have any underbarrel attachment so that left what? a sight, silencer, or mag, thats it....

Secondary weapons were crap compared to MW2, in MW2 YOU HAD LOADS TO CHOOSE FROM, sure thumper and rockets were spamed but still you got a good selcetion.

Snipers in black ops were horrible for over half a year, because in nerfing quickscoping they nerfed sniping all together.

Assault rifles were all the same and little change with them, no recoil, high rate of fire, ect

Overall the zombies is the only reason I kept the game.

like i said we all have out own opinions
i like treyarchs black ops and you like infinity wards/sledgehammers mw3

[KaliaHaze]

Black Ops by far.

[Rdsxbaseballfan]

Black Ops by far.
yeah there we go. someone with good taste in a game

[Wesley1369]

MW3 is the better game by far if you play online. the online maps for black ops are a joke.

[User_Does Not Exist]

BLOPS for Zombies but not for online
MW3 online and campaign for sure though!!!

[DerBear]

yeah there we go. someone with good taste in a game

who is clearly on drugs lol

And then look at the last two post above this one, some great people, palying a great game....
LOL

[KaliaHaze]

who is clearly on drugs lol

And then look at the last two post above this one, some great people, palying a great game....
LOL

Why would you make such an assumption? Really.

[CrashingWaves]

I don't really like either, but of the two I think MW3 is better, however I hate all the multiplayer maps in MW3 because they are all short range, I can do well on them but I prefer sniping

[DerBear]

I don't really like either, but of the two I think MW3 is better, however I hate all the multiplayer maps in MW3 because they are all short range, I can do well on them but I prefer sniping

I know what you mean, like in MW2 you had sniper maps because there were areas you could snipe, now its only like 1 or 2 places that you can do some long range sniping.

[spiderdude]

Black ops is way better

[Roddy15]

MW3 wins hands down.

Black Ops has a serious issue with maps designed by 2 year olds and have you see the amount of fog in half the missions? It's hardly foggy everywhere?

MW3 feels more finished, maps are good, spec ops is great and the campaign finished the story off. The one issue is though is that the campaign is very predictable. All CoD games are predictable now though...

[Jdawg91]

Ive been a cod veteran since 2003 and I can assure you that both of these games have nothing on call of duty 1 sorry.