View Full Version : posible new law for boys
curiouse97
November 27th, 2011, 12:02 PM
Ive been seeing several servays on putting teen boys 13-17 in Chastity belts. :( what do you think about this? the justification is to to stop teen from having babys. how old are you? would you wear if you had to?
Ender
November 27th, 2011, 12:05 PM
Can you provide evidence to this?
MysticalBurrito
November 27th, 2011, 12:05 PM
I like the idea. I think they should make one with a bear trap on it. :rolleyes:
trooneh
November 27th, 2011, 04:14 PM
I agree, is there any evidence of this? It sounds like something the Catholic Church would endorse, however...
BFG9001
November 28th, 2011, 12:36 AM
Sounds fucking insipid.
Camazot
November 28th, 2011, 12:46 AM
thats just fucked up no one should ever wear one just kids dont have sex
Sugaree
November 28th, 2011, 02:16 AM
So has it occurred to you that not every teenage boy is out looking for snatch? If they don't want to have sex and feel that wearing a chastity belt keeps them away from that, then more power to them. It's not like they're going to wear it for the rest of their lives. Sex is a personal decision for everyone, you shouldn't be pressured to have it. I myself have no desire to have sex, but I you don't see me running around on a high horse.
Sporadica
November 30th, 2011, 10:59 PM
if you look at statistics teen sex rates are going down
here in Canada kids who are 15 only 20% have had sex and by graduating high school it's around 25-30%
so alot of people who ay they've had sex are bluffing, no real way to prove unless pics/vid or you see it happen.
Jean Poutine
November 30th, 2011, 11:40 PM
I'm 21 and spent all my teenagehood without knocking anybody up.
Hell, I spent it all without sex.
Another insipid, reactionary stupidity by hardcore conservatives.
insanity
December 1st, 2011, 12:47 PM
sounds like a joke... are you sure where ever you read this/ heard it wasnt just you know.. ummm joking??
Jupiter
December 1st, 2011, 05:21 PM
14. never ever would. what are they even... like.. useful for.. haha.
Neptune
December 2nd, 2011, 05:18 AM
14. never ever would. what are they even... like.. useful for.. haha.
You can't have sex. It prevents a guy from knocking up a girl. They're useful to parents who are anal about their sons sex life.
Carlyle
December 2nd, 2011, 06:15 AM
Is there a source for this?? Anyways.. Sure, a chastity belt would help the issue of teen pregnancy, but does every 13-17 year old guy really need that much restraint? It takes self control not to have sex, but forcing that onto a society of teens might be a bad idea. Considering part of being human is wanting what you can't have, this might escalate the issue even further.
seawhorez
December 2nd, 2011, 06:00 PM
I don't think this is even possible. lol, I'd like to see some proof that this was even real? xD
Craig1995
December 3rd, 2011, 04:16 AM
I agree, is there any evidence of this? It sounds like something the Catholic Church would endorse, however...
This :)
Abigballofdust
December 3rd, 2011, 05:19 AM
I've only seen it in old sex ed books and they were mentioning it as old.
If this is real though, we can just kick ourselves back to the middle ages... Anybody seen a witch I could burn?
MysticalBurrito
December 3rd, 2011, 08:55 AM
I've only seen it in old sex ed books and they were mentioning it as old.
If this is real though, we can just kick ourselves back to the middle ages... Anybody seen a witch I could burn?
*Ahem*
My last post was me being a sarcastic bitch. I honestly don't think it's a good idea or if there's even proof of what the guy is saying about it. A human is going to do what a human wants to do.
UnknownError
December 3rd, 2011, 09:14 AM
Lmao I doubt this is real. Why would they ever create a law like this?
edit: 2,900th post. :o
Njathind
December 3rd, 2011, 09:25 AM
Again I would want proof of this. However if it did turn out to be tru I would love to know how they would enforce this. Its like the law in the UK that you have to be over 16 to have sex. I am yet to see to 13 year olds get arrested and charged because they had sex, its just doesnt happen.
This to me sounds like religion gone mad, instead of making stupid laws why dont they invest money in teaching children more about sex and what not, mind you it would have to be factual not some crap like "if you have sex your hands will fall off" or some other stuff like that.
In the UK they are looking at teaching sex ed at a younger age which I think is a great idea.
curiouse97
December 3rd, 2011, 11:24 AM
google chastity belt teen law and it will come up. Its not religion its Goverment! thare is a medical profeser that wants to put a chimival in vacines tostop you from being fertal. Its all government testing. thare idea is to only let the rich profesional educated biggits have kids. Its all about controle. and to inforce the chastity belt they want to put a gps and a heat sinsor that will tell who has and hwo has not complyed. the only thing that is stoping it is trying to figure out who is going to monitor and do the enspections.
Djentleman
December 3rd, 2011, 02:15 PM
I find it quite humorous to think that people hear the would "chastity" and immediately leap to the conclusion that this supposed future law was founded on religious grounds.
Every month I hear a teen under 15 having intercourse and actually giving possibilities to birth when they're struggling to get to school on time because of late night COD sessions (just a hypothetical generalisation).
So it would only make sense to believe that the government be concerned over the deteriorating standards society seems to setting itself.
I think a couple weeks ago I read that an 11 year old boy got a girl of the same age or a bit younger pregnant. I only had three things to say. What the fuck.
Maxxie
December 4th, 2011, 10:33 PM
Puberty = hormones
hormones = sex drive
sex drive = sex
Problem?
Peace God
December 5th, 2011, 02:41 AM
Every month I hear a teen under 15 having intercourse and actually giving possibilities to birth when they're struggling to get to school on time because of late night COD sessions (just a hypothetical generalisation).
You said it yourself.
So it would only make sense to believe that the government be concerned over the deteriorating standards society seems to setting itself.
Deteriorating? Teens are fucking less and using more protection than in previous generations.
Raven287287n
December 5th, 2011, 02:55 AM
Sounds fucking insipid.
I know right
xChrisVx
December 7th, 2011, 04:56 PM
I don't think the person making these surveys have actually researched this. If they had they would have realised that masturbation actually helps teens. We all know what happens when we don't masturbate for a while and it can be pretty painful. By putting teens in chastity belts they are gonna make us go through that pain. Also not every teenage boy goes out looking for sex. I know that i am against this.
Tyler12
December 7th, 2011, 04:59 PM
Hell yea wouldn't haft to worry about condoms or nutting
bigjohnson
December 7th, 2011, 05:02 PM
i dont think so
Filipitty
December 13th, 2011, 12:20 PM
I doubt thats likely, since it would cost several million pounds/dollars to do.
mekon
September 16th, 2012, 10:44 AM
yes it's a good idea, all boys from 12 to 20 should be put into chastity belts.they should also be shaved.
Gigablue
September 16th, 2012, 10:54 AM
Please don't bump old threads. This is more than 2 months old.
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.