Log in

View Full Version : World War 3


nwshc
May 22nd, 2005, 07:07 PM
I was just reading up on it and came across the site http://www.threeworldwars.com/world-war-3/ww3.htm
Read for yourself and come up with your own conclutions.

The Planned World War 3 - A Play in Numerous Acts

A Three World War scenario was developed several decades ago (see Conspiratorial History). Two World Wars have already been achieved, and the Third and final World War envisions an attack on Iraq as being the trigger to set the entire Middle East into fiery conflagration. Once America is firmly entrenched into Iraq (or elsewhere in the Middle East - like Syria) with the majority of her first-line units, North Korea is to attack South Korea. Then, with America's forces stretched well beyond the limit, China is to invade Taiwan. This will usher in the start of World War Three.

What constitutes a 'world war'? How many countries need to be involved? And who decides at which point a number of regional skirmishes can be grouped together and called a World War? At the time, who called the official start of World War 1 and World War 2?

And have you noticed that although the term 'World War Three' is freely used in the alternative press and on the Internet, all the major news networks have stoically avoided using any phrase reminiscent of World War.

Since it's difficult to find a definition for an event which has only happened three times in modern history, here's my attempt at an answer to the question 'what constitutes a world war'?

World War Definition:

A World War is a military conflict spanning more than 2 continents, in which at least 20 major countries participate in an attack against a common enemy, and which has the attention of the man-in-the-street due to the significant loss of life.

With that definition, we can agree that WW1 and WW2 were in fact World Wars (both wars involved some degree of participation from most of the world's then existing countries: Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United States and the Soviet Union), and that we are very close to achieving World War 3. The only requirement left to fulfil the start of WW3 is that of a military conflict spanning more than 2 continents. As soon as Israel attacks Palestine, or North Korea attacks South Korea or the US, or China invades Taiwan, we will have the next World War well underway.

World War 3 Timeline

These are, we believe, the elements of the planned Third World War:

*

Prelude - The events leading up to the start of World War Three, including Sept 11, 2001.
*

Act 1 - The Middle East. Widespread conflict to bring the entire region into the flames of war, possibly triggered by Iran or militants in Pakistan using North Korean supplied nuclear arms. The first Scene in this Act is the US Invasion of Iraq on March 20, 2003.
*

Act 2 - Israel at War -- Against her Arab neighbors, possibly Palestine. A Palestinian State will be established, so that all Israelis will be fully separated from Palestinians (listen out for mention of a 7-year treaty to be confirmed by a World Leader - probably Bush), only for Israel to viciously attack Palestine shortly thereafter.
*

Act 3 - Far East -- "Hair-raising nuclear confrontation that threatens mankind's existence" - Peter Lemesurier, author of The Armageddon Script, p. 223, written in 1981. Includes China invading Taiwan and a nuclear eruption on the Korean Peninsula.
*

Act 4 - Erosion of Confidence in 'The System' so severe citizens will be panicked into giving up liberties and Constitutional form of government. The plan calls for the dissolution of the US Constitution, triggered by a significant enough 'terrorist' attack.
*

Act 5 - The collapse of the US, and other Western economies and morals.
*

Curtain. Who can tell how this war will end?

Both Biblical prophecy and the Illuminati plan state that Israel is the key. The Third World War is planned to begin when Israel goes to war against her Arab enemies. Then and only then will all the other elements begin to occur and they will occur in rapid succession. The plan is to have one disaster following another in such rapid succession that, before people can mentally and emotionally handle one disastrous news event, they will be hit with another. It is also true to say that until ALL the elements for WW3 are in place, the plan will not commence.

While it would be naive to suggest a specific timeline for the events leading up to and including World War 3, we do know that the plans for WWIII are well advanced, and our leaders involved in this secret plan are waiting only for the right signal before all-out war begins.

We are in the last stages of the preparation to so globalize the world that the Masonic New Age Christ (Antichrist) can appear to receive all the political and economic power of the world's rulers. This is the Illuminati plan and Biblical prophecy (Revelation 17:12-17).

I believe that World War Three started on March 20, 2003, exactly 555 days after Sept 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center. That's 57 years, 6 months and 18 days after the end of WWII.

In the words of Peter Lemesurier, author of The Armageddon Script:

"Their script is now written, subject only to last-minute editing and stage-directions. The stage itself, albeit in darkness, is almost ready. Down in the pit, the subterranean orchestra is already tuning up. The last-minute, walk-on parts are even now being filled. Most of the main actors, one suspects, have already taken up their roles. Soon it will be time for them to come on stage, ready for the curtain to rise.

The time for action will have come."


And here is another little tidbit to look at
http://www.threeworldwars.com/overview.htm

I thought this all to be very facinating. With much google searching, many belive it will be sometime between 2015 and 2050.
What do you think?

Gothic_Knight
May 22nd, 2005, 07:51 PM
Another one of these end of world philosophies...

Look, here are some things that you have to look at:

1. WWIII cannot be stopped. Technically, you can consider the last one WWIII because the first one happened already. It's called the Crusades. Technically, it'd be WWIV, to it's definition. Maybe, considering the HRE was about 15 countries...
2. We already started giving up our right to privacy. And I doubt the Constitution will dissolve. The media is WAY too powerful. It wouldn't work.
3. I've heard over time and time again about the Antichrist theories. Technically, it's supposed to happen in 2012. Know what? Who cares. Anyone in their right mind would not give complete world power to one man. That'd be stupid. Besides, by then, we'd probably be able to resurrect people. Andrew Jackson, anyone? :wink:
4. I'll be damned if that conflict between the Isralies and the Palestinians is solved for another 100 years.
5. Iran's government WILL be civily overthrown soon. There's pretty much opposition to it. So that's gone.
6. I expect a war between China and Taiwan. All Taiwan has to do is declare their independence.

Finally, if we are attacked again, I'll be DAMNED if I give up my right to bear arms, five main freedoms, right to due process, etc. Do you know what that means?

A dissolution of the Constitution means that races are no longer protected. Gays, lesbians, latinos, blacks, arabs, Irish, ANYONE CAN BE PROSECUTED for no reason. Slavery will exist.

I guarentee you...it will NOT happen. Not from some Mayan prophecy, not because some pope known as the Gloria Olivae, NO! The Antichrist will be assassinated before he can claim power. And I guarentee you, if he does, I give him a week to live.

<-Dying_to_Live->
May 22nd, 2005, 10:56 PM
society is too advanced nowadays to have another world war. i dont believe its possible

Ravenous
May 23rd, 2005, 01:34 AM
There will probably be another world war. Youd have though wed learn after one and two.

Anonymous
May 23rd, 2005, 02:24 AM
world war aint too big a problem, but now we have nukes............one goes ff, kiss the worlds sweet ass goodbye.

<-Dying_to_Live->
May 23rd, 2005, 09:14 AM
you cant destroy the world popo...

Whisper
May 23rd, 2005, 09:21 AM
you cant destroy the world popo...

I agree humans are to stupid to have a device capible of literally ripping an entire planet apart, the thing is you don't need to though, all you have to do is fuck up the extremly sensitive ecosystem making the surface uninhabitible to human life, nuclear winter.

<-Dying_to_Live->
May 23rd, 2005, 09:37 AM
true true

redcar
May 23rd, 2005, 10:43 AM
china and north korea are going to be main countries in ww3 for the simple reason china is growing into a a very powerful country and will soon rival that of the usa, and plus they are coummunists.
and north korea it is pretty obvious that they will eventually start a war with south korea, and when that happens we will all know about it because they are a nuclear nation.

Millermagic
May 23rd, 2005, 12:49 PM
I agree with that to some extent.

My thoughts on Act 1: I agree with it. The muslim world does not like western religion, western forms of government and western people. Many of the muslims in the middle east believe that anyone who is not the same religion as them should be killed. So expanding into the middle east by going further than Iraq would definitely pervoke the middle-easterners. Iraq is going to be our base of operations in the middle east. However, I don't think that North Korea is going to supply pakistani militants with nuclear weapons, they might be able to get them from somewhere else though.

My thoughts on Act 2: This will happen. I 100% agree with this. I really don't think that Israel belongs in the middle east. I'm not discriminating against Jews in any way, but they do not belong in the middle east. Especially since Palastine had land taken from them to make a colony for the Jews in the middle east. Again, I am not trying to offend or discrminate against anyone here.

My thoughts on Act 3: I could see this happening too, but maybe not the exact scenario. I definitely think that there is going to be a nuclear confrontation, but I don't think it will be korea or taiwan. I think korea's bark is worse that it's bite; honestly, I don't think that they are going to do anything. Anyone that is thinking right, and I'm not saying anything twards the mental stability of North Korea's ruler, wouldn't attack anyone else that has nukes, becasue both sides would loose. It may be china. China has a sixth of the world's population and we are going to be competing for oil soon, and if China wants it, they might go as far to threaten to nuke us. Could it threaten mankind, yes and no. It couldn't if it was just the 2 nations, US and China. But if nations start paying bakc for it, we could face a nuclear holocause and it could lead to the extinction of man kind.

My thoughs on Act 4: Inevitable. No governmental sysyem is going to last forever. A centrist government, like ours in the United states isn't going to last, neither is a far right government (facist) or a far left government (communist). With so many different ethnic groups and different interests, unfortuantyely, the US isn't going to be around much longer

My thoughs on Act 5: Our modern civilized scociety could possibly be taken over by the not-so-civilized scociety of the middle east.

nwshc
May 23rd, 2005, 01:52 PM
The guy that made that site is probably a nut anyways. But its something to think about...

maximan
May 23rd, 2005, 02:36 PM
My thoughts on Act 1: I agree with it. The muslim world does not like western religion, western forms of government and western people. Many of the muslims in the middle east believe that anyone who is not the same religion as them should be killed. So expanding into the middle east by going further than Iraq would definitely pervoke the middle-easterners.


ARE YOU KIDDING ME? Muslim people at large have no problem with the west! I've been there, I've talked to them, I would know. It's their GOVERNMENTS that they can't OVERTHROW that have problems. The people in IRAN HATE their government, but they can't do anything about it! And they also dont like it when we bomb them. That statement you made was extrememly stereotypical and generalized and somewhat racist. If you don't know what you're talking about...don't try!

Gothic_Knight
May 23rd, 2005, 03:11 PM
My thoughs on Act 5: Our modern civilized scociety could possibly be taken over by the not-so-civilized scociety of the middle east.

Man, that is one of the most ignorant statements I have heard in my life.

The Arabic World is a lot more civilized than the majority of the world. It had an advanced civilization since the middle ages, far surpassing both Asia and Europe. Maybe you're thinking of the extremists, but the majority of the Muslim World is VERY civilized.

<-Dying_to_Live->
May 23rd, 2005, 05:46 PM
um, he was talking comparatively to our society. if you think the arabs who are dirt poor and starving and living in shithole countries in the middle east are just as advanced and capable as people in britain or the rest of the western world, you out of your mind

Gothic_Knight
May 23rd, 2005, 06:02 PM
um, he was talking comparatively to our society. if you think the arabs who are dirt poor and starving and living in shithole countries in the middle east are just as advanced and capable as people in britain or the rest of the western world, you out of your mind-_- Not all of them are dirt poor as you say. What about the middle class? They're just people, they live like we do. You'd be surprised how advanced they were, considering that the Arabs are kinda the reason why we get taught math and got out of the Dark Ages in the first place...

<-Dying_to_Live->
May 23rd, 2005, 06:04 PM
so maybe not every single arab person in the world fits my stereotype, but your still ahve to agree that we are civilized and advanced than they

maximan
May 23rd, 2005, 06:06 PM
so maybe not every single arab person in the world fits my stereotype, but your still ahve to agree that we are civilized and advanced than they

Nope. I went to Iran, its just as advanced as us. And that's such a stupid stereotype...there's TONS of highclass and middle class people. Unemployment there runs about 15%, which is a lot, but there are plenty of well off and rich people. But they have malls and cinemas and computers and video games and the people are nice and they have chain buisnesses etc.

<-Dying_to_Live->
May 23rd, 2005, 06:45 PM
you went to iran as a tourist right? which means you went to an upper class touristic location. that doesnt represent the whole country. maybe me and you have different definitions on what it is to be civilized. iran, in which 40% of people are below the poverty line, is hardly considered civilized by me

Millermagic
May 23rd, 2005, 06:45 PM
I wasn't downing anyone. But I am saying that the middle-easterners use guerilla tactics. Acting so sophisticated, we can't cope with it. It works for the US against the brits.

nwshc
May 23rd, 2005, 06:54 PM
you went to iran as a tourist right? which means you went to an upper class touristic location. that doesnt represent the whole country. maybe me and you have different definitions on what it is to be civilized. iran, in which 40% of people are below the poverty line, is hardly considered civilized by me

Its just like if you go to the Bahamas. If you stay in the tourist locations, it looks all fancy and nice. But as soon as you leave it, you hit raggedy people shooting snot rockets everywhere. Same in Mexico too. Many rich people, but lots of crime and especially child abductions.

maximan
May 23rd, 2005, 07:00 PM
you went to iran as a tourist right? which means you went to an upper class touristic location. that doesnt represent the whole country. maybe me and you have different definitions on what it is to be civilized. iran, in which 40% of people are below the poverty line, is hardly considered civilized by me

Its just like if you go to the Bahamas. If you stay in the tourist locations, it looks all fancy and nice. But as soon as you leave it, you hit raggedy people shooting snot rockets everywhere. Same in Mexico too. Many rich people, but lots of crime and especially child abductions.

No, I stayed with family, and went around the ENTIRE country, including remote locations, big cities, and tourist resorts. I went up north to the Caspian Sea, out to Shiraz and Esfahan, in Tehran, down to Kish, and some more small towns which we stayed in for a few hours. They were all pretty advanced. I'll grant a lot more people there are in poverty than here, but people don't know what they're talking abot.

<-Dying_to_Live->
May 23rd, 2005, 07:42 PM
have any pics? im not trying to be snobbish or anythign just curious of other cultures...

maximan
May 23rd, 2005, 07:49 PM
have any pics? im not trying to be snobbish or anythign just curious of other cultures...

Not on this comp, I have some on my dads. He's out of town but he's getting back in tommorow...I'll have him locate them for me then.