Log in

View Full Version : Earthquake hits English Channel


TheMatrix
July 15th, 2011, 01:32 AM
Source (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-14153116)


An earthquake with a magnitude of 3.9 has struck in the English Channel, the British Geological Survey (BGS) said.

The quake had a depth of 10km and its epicentre was south of Portsmouth, according to the BGS.

Residents in parts of West Sussex reported buildings shaking for a few seconds at about 0800 BST.

Sussex Police, Solent Coastguard and West Sussex Fire and Rescue Service said they had not been called out to any incidents related to it.
'Largest since 1734'

David Kerridge, from the BGS, said it was the biggest incident of its kind in the area for nearly 300 years.

He said: "This is the largest earthquake in this area since a magnitude 4.5 event in 1734.

"Historically, there have been two other significant events nearby - a magnitude 5.0 earthquake in 1878 and a magnitude 4.3 earthquake in 1750.

"In the UK, we experience an earthquake of this magnitude approximately every two years."

Small earthquakes are not uncommon in the British Isles.

In January a 3.6-magnitude quake struck 9km (5.5 miles) north-west of Ripon, North Yorkshire.


Sheezus, even though I live close(well, close enough) to the fault line here in San Jose California, we haven't had any earthquake of this scale for some time(if I remember correctly).

skater94
July 15th, 2011, 02:54 AM
Well, everyone says that we're bound for the big one. I live just north of Washington state, and every geologist is worrying about the "big one" striking the Pacific coast.

TheMatrix
July 15th, 2011, 03:15 AM
Well, everyone says that we're bound for the big one. I live just north of Washington state, and every geologist is worrying about the "big one" striking the Pacific coast.
California Included?

skater94
July 15th, 2011, 01:25 PM
Why not? The great Cascadia earthquake of the 1700's affected California. It was so powerful that tsunami generated by the earthquake travelled To Japan.

TheMatrix
July 15th, 2011, 04:38 PM
*Ahem*
California wasn't around in the 1700s...

Perseus
July 15th, 2011, 04:39 PM
*Ahem*
California wasn't around in the 1700s...

Oh, right. It's not like the giant landmass has existed for millions of years.

TheMatrix
July 15th, 2011, 04:52 PM
Oh, right. It's not like the giant landmass has existed for millions of years.
Did I say it wasn't?

I was implying that it would have been better said as "what is now California". You agree?

Amnesiac
July 15th, 2011, 05:36 PM
Did I say it wasn't?

I was implying that it would have been better said as "what is now California". You agree?

The area that's now California has been called "California" since the 1500s (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_the_name_California).

Anyway, I don't see why this is an exciting event – earthquakes can happen on any fault line, the Channel is no exception. Hell, they even have magnitude 6 earthquakes in Australia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquakes_in_Western_Australia).

Tristin.
July 15th, 2011, 05:38 PM
earthquakes? in the UK? rare muchly :P

SosbanFach
July 15th, 2011, 05:40 PM
earthquakes? in the UK? rare muchly :P

Why do people always say what I'm thinking?

Tristin.
July 15th, 2011, 05:41 PM
also, its the channel? not a fault line? :P

LKIFMRUG9556
July 20th, 2011, 12:50 PM
I live in the UK, i never heard about that??:L