RileyLP
July 2nd, 2011, 12:44 PM
I was reading a poll in this forum asking if guys and girls would circumcise their boy children at birth. My opinion is to leave things uncut so that boys can make that decision for themselves. Of course if there is a medical problem there might not be a choice.
It got me thinking though. Is it really better to wait so guys can make the choice themselves? I know there are a few guys on here that got cut a long time after birth. For you guys only:
1. Would you rather have had it done at birth because it is a lot easier then?
2. Did you agree with the decision for you to get cut?
3. Do you think that the scarring will always be worse for you because it was done later? Does that bother you?
4. Are you glad you had the chance to know what it was like to have foreskin?
It got me thinking though. Is it really better to wait so guys can make the choice themselves? I know there are a few guys on here that got cut a long time after birth. For you guys only:
1. Would you rather have had it done at birth because it is a lot easier then?
2. Did you agree with the decision for you to get cut?
3. Do you think that the scarring will always be worse for you because it was done later? Does that bother you?
4. Are you glad you had the chance to know what it was like to have foreskin?