View Full Version : black & mild
mtime
February 11th, 2007, 10:16 PM
Has anyone ever heard of these? They are like a small cigar, I just had a quick question about them. I heard that they are worse than smoking a cigarette, is this true? If so, what is not as bad as smoking a cigarette?That tastes good?
Hyper
February 12th, 2007, 07:23 AM
I have never smoked something that ''tastes'' good but if you want to know whats in a usual smoke google it and youl see its perfect poison in small addictive amounts then use your head, anything that's sold illegaly and is unknown to you is problably worse
guitarro
February 12th, 2007, 01:03 PM
Black and milds are really bad for you. When I used to smoke and roll blunts out of them, there is a piece of white paper that everyone calls "cancer paper", and we would remove it. Cigars in general are way more potent than ciggerettes.
serial-thrilla
February 12th, 2007, 04:47 PM
I have never smoked something that ''tastes'' good but if you want to know whats in a usual smoke google it and youl see its perfect poison in small addictive amounts then use your head, anything that's sold illegaly and is unknown to you is problably worse not really correct, smoking kills waaaaay more people every year then all illegal drugs combined.
Hyper
February 12th, 2007, 06:53 PM
not really correct, smoking kills waaaaay more people every year then all illegal drugs combined.
Smoking kills way slower than drugs
mtime
February 12th, 2007, 09:00 PM
Black and milds are really bad for you. When I used to smoke and roll blunts out of them, there is a piece of white paper that everyone calls "cancer paper", and we would remove it. Cigars in general are way more potent than ciggerettes.
What if I took out the "cancer paper" and rolled it in something else?
Cap'nCrunch
February 12th, 2007, 09:02 PM
Never had a Black and Mild, but I've smoked swishers and Phillies. They are definitely worse for your lungs than a cigarette, because they're bigger and have a hell of a lot more tobacco in em.
I don't think there's anything that feels or tastes as good but's healthy too. Sorry.
mtime
February 12th, 2007, 10:27 PM
I dont mean "healthy" I just mean not as bad as cigarettes.
Bankai15
February 12th, 2007, 10:38 PM
Drugs and smokeing in every shape for or fashon is not good for you period.
For those of you that do smoke please do in resonable manner.
itswhatever_yep
February 12th, 2007, 11:23 PM
In a magazine i saw cigarettes that were healthy. I dont think they had tobacco in them but some people smoke because they like the feeling in there lungs and i guess thats who these were made for
serial-thrilla
February 13th, 2007, 03:52 PM
Smoking kills way slower than drugs not always. unless of course someone ods, thats pretty quick.
Hyper
February 13th, 2007, 04:03 PM
not always. unless of course someone ods, thats pretty quick.
Ehh..? Under smoking I mean the legal addictive components you can buy from a store
serial-thrilla
February 13th, 2007, 06:07 PM
Ehh..? Under smoking I mean the legal addictive components you can buy from a storei know and im saying that smoking wont always take longer to kill you then drugs. unless of course you od on something like coke then obviously the death would be faster.
chelsea714
February 13th, 2007, 10:47 PM
what the heck is this? Of course smoking kills slower than drugs. Whoever thinks otherwise must be retarded. If you smoke for 50 years you will still be alive, if you do cocaine for 50 years it would be a miracle if you are still alive
serial-thrilla
February 14th, 2007, 01:22 PM
what the heck is this? Of course smoking kills slower than drugs. Whoever thinks otherwise must be retarded. If you smoke for 50 years you will still be alive, if you do cocaine for 50 years it would be a miracle if you are still alive shut the fuck up, i happen to know that smoking can kill alot you in alot less time then 50 years. although it is true that doing cocaine for 50 years would not put you in good shape.
Hyper
February 14th, 2007, 02:36 PM
shut the fuck up, i happen to know that smoking can kill alot you in alot less time then 50 years. although it is true that doing cocaine for 50 years would not put you in good shape.
I think the max some1 has survived by doing cocaine constantly is 20-30 years
serial-thrilla
February 14th, 2007, 02:52 PM
I think the max some1 has survived by doing cocaine constantly is 20-30 yearsim not sure if thats true. like that may be accurate but i doubt all the cokeheads in the world are known and tested to see how long they survive.
mtime
February 14th, 2007, 09:33 PM
If I take the "cancer paper" out would it be as bad?
mtime
February 18th, 2007, 10:02 PM
anyone?
chelsea714
February 18th, 2007, 10:39 PM
shut the fuck up, i happen to know that smoking can kill alot you in alot less time then 50 years. although it is true that doing cocaine for 50 years would not put you in good shape.
you want to tell me to shut the fuck up? what are you even saying/ trying to prove? Are you trying to say that smoking cigerettes is worse than drugs or something? because it isn't
serial-thrilla
February 18th, 2007, 11:30 PM
you want to tell me to shut the fuck up? what are you even saying/ trying to prove? Are you trying to say that smoking cigerettes is worse than drugs or something? because it isn'twell it depends on what drugs they are. some drugs are worse for you then ciggarettes and some are not.
BillyWitchDoctor.com
February 19th, 2007, 11:40 AM
exactly. ciggarettes are much worse for u than weed. Heroin, meth, w/e is much worse for u than ciggs. i jus twana get someting strait about the black & milds, if they're a cigar then there'd b 2 things u could do w/ it. Smoke it as a cigar (where unless ur stupid u dont inhale) or roll a blunt w/ its paper and inhale. i like smoking cigars every once in a while for fun, but u dont inhale w/ a cigar...thats just not how u smoke it. for a blunt, some papers are worse than others sooooo, idk, i have no info about black&mild's for u sry
serial-thrilla
February 19th, 2007, 03:37 PM
lots of ppl inhale cigars. its very bad for you though
BillyWitchDoctor.com
February 20th, 2007, 01:58 PM
it is very bad for u, it doesnt taste good, AND if u smoke cigars like w/ people and ur buyin expensive cigars if u inhale ur not smoking them right. the real way to smoke it is juts to draw the smoke into ur mouth and blow it out. BUT W/E! lol
JunkBondTrader
February 28th, 2007, 03:42 PM
Black and Mild... those are Krettesks aren't they? A krettek is much worse than a cigarette as it is filled with ground cloves which, while giving off a mild anaesthetic effect are extremely high in tar.
Use them in moderation.
TheWizard
February 28th, 2007, 05:51 PM
anyone?
Yes it is still very bad.
zackF.
June 29th, 2007, 12:24 AM
I have had plenty of black and milds mostly cause i can blow smoke rings with them pretty good. But your aren't supposed to inhale cigars (black and milds), but i do anyway. They are actually pretty good. I'm not saying go out and smoke one but unlike like cigarettes you arent supposed to inhale cigars. Therefore, in my opinion I would probably say cigars are better than cigarettes, but then again the best alternative is quitting
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.