Log in

View Full Version : Osama Bin Laden's Sons Say U.S. Broke Law in Killing Their Father


ShyGuyInChicago
May 10th, 2011, 02:55 PM
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/osama-bin-laden-son-omar-us-broke-law/story?id=13571480&page=1


he sons of Osama bin Laden have issued a statement that accuses the U.S. of violating international law by killing an unarmed man and dumping his body in the ocean.
The statement, which was prepared by Omar bin Laden said Osama bin Laden had been denied the presumption of innocence and a fair trial. It said the "assassination" of Osama bin Laden "blatantly violated" international law.
"We maintain that arbitrary killing is not a solution to political problems," said the statement. The message, which also asks the Pakistani government to release the bin Laden wives and children currently in custody, is titled "A Statement from the Sons of bin Laden," but it is only signed by Omar. It also says bin Laden's sons do not believe President Obama's account of the operation that killed their father and would be following up with both U.S. and international courts.

Seychelles Honeymoon? Royal Couple Gets Away Watch Video



Princess Diana Crash Photos to Premiere in Film Watch Video



Tensions Rise Between U.S. and Pakistan Watch Video


Last week, after the raid that killed Omar bin Laden, his son Khalid and three other people, Attorney General Eric Holder stressed that the mission was legal. "Let me make something very clear," said Holder. "The operation in which Osama bin Laden was killed was lawful. He was the head of al Qaeda, an organization that conducted the attacks of September the 11th. He admitted his involvement."
Omar bin Laden, 30, has not lived with his father since 1999, when he and his mother, Najwa bin Laden, left him in Afghanistan. Omar has denounced violence, and the message includes a reminder that Omar had made clear to Osama that he "always disagreed with [him] regarding any violence."
A version of the statement was given to the New York Times by Jean Sasson, the American author who co-wrote Omar bin Laden's memoir, "Growing Up bin Laden," which was published in 2009. Another version was posted on the Arabic language website mafa.asia.
In his book, Omar describes himself as a romantic during his coming of age in the wilds of Tora Bora, Afghanistan. He dreamed of following his older brother Abdullah's example, marrying a Bin Laden cousin and living in the quiet comfort his father left behind in Saudi Arabia.
"I spent hours thinking about a certain cousin, a pretty and sweet girl…imagining us falling in love, getting married, and living in a lovely home filled with sweet-faced children," he wrote, tuning a small radio to hear the love songs of Um Kulthum as part of a "desperate need to create a new life."

Omar Bin Laden in 2010: After Bin Laden, It'll Be 'Much, Much Worse'

When he was interviewed by ABC News in early 2010, Omar had a chilling warning for those who were hunting his father.
He said that if his father were killed, the worst might lie ahead. America might face a broader and more violent enemy, with nothing to keep them in check.
"From what I knew of my father and the people around him I believe he is the most kind among them, because some are much, much worse," said bin Laden. "Their mentality wants to make more violence, to create more problems."

Seychelles Honeymoon? Royal Couple Gets Away Watch Video



Princess Diana Crash Photos to Premiere in Film Watch Video



Tensions Rise Between U.S. and Pakistan Watch Video


Omar turned his back on his father's philosophy even though his father had picked him to succeed him as the leader of jihad.
"Attacking peaceful people is not being fair, it is unacceptable," bin Laden told ABC News. "If you have a problem with armies or governments you should fight those people. This is what I find unacceptable in my father's way."
But bin Laden was confident at the time that despite the $25 million bounty on his father's head, his father wouldn't be caught.
"It's been 30 years now since he started fighting there," said Omar. "Who could catch him? No one."

Infidelitas
May 10th, 2011, 04:37 PM
And how many rules did he break with bringing down the twin towers?

Suicune
May 10th, 2011, 04:51 PM
And how many rules did he break with bringing down the twin towers?

This.

I believe the killing was legal. His son can cry if he wants but it was legal.

Zephyr
May 10th, 2011, 07:43 PM
There is one part I agree with, and that was giving him a trial. Simply killing him was jumping the gun rather than trying to apprehend him first. Even if he's openly admitted guilt, he would still be entitled to a trial.

Kahn
May 10th, 2011, 07:58 PM
There is one part I agree with, and that was giving him a trial. Simply killing him was jumping the gun rather than trying to apprehend him first. Even if he's openly admitted guilt, he would still be entitled to a trial.

This.

Also, I think many Americans would've rather seen him captured than killed right away.

anonymous53
May 10th, 2011, 09:21 PM
We'd much rather him been captured, but the statement said he was in a room full of weapons, and they believed he was reaching for an AK-47 near him.
So he wasn't completely unarmed.

tpzy94
May 10th, 2011, 09:23 PM
im sure he broke a rule for trauncy and distuction of property n oh homicide

TheMatrix
May 12th, 2011, 01:00 AM
Also, I think many Americans would've rather seen him captured than killed right away.

They're Americans; what do you expect?

BTW, I can say that 'cos I'm Dutch.

CaptainObvious
May 12th, 2011, 02:06 AM
There is one part I agree with, and that was giving him a trial. Simply killing him was jumping the gun rather than trying to apprehend him first. Even if he's openly admitted guilt, he would still be entitled to a trial.

This.

Also, I think many Americans would've rather seen him captured than killed right away.

Yeah maybe, but this was an armed incursion into a heavily militarized area of Pakistan. I heard everyone second guessing the operation but I keep wondering if you're all remembering how easily this could have been Black Hawk Down Mk 2. pretty much just as easily. Shit was messy, and it needed to be quick. They made a battlefield decision, and it was the superior outcome anyways, so I don't see a really great argument against the way things were implemented.

also, $10 says this "bin laden's sons" part is BS. omar's the one who said he wouldn't give up his father if he had known where he was back when he was interviewed in 2008 or whatever. i do not care whatsoever what he thinks about the subject.

Kahn
May 12th, 2011, 09:26 PM
They're Americans; what do you expect?

BTW, I can say that 'cos I'm Dutch.

No. You can't just say things because you are something. You clog wearing Dutch people are just so relentless!

Stereotypical nonsense aside, having the right to fair trial is a right we Americans live by, and if he was going to be punished under American jurisdiction, he deserved such rights.

I do agree with you, however, David. It was a military mission with only one motive- to eliminate the target. I'm just saying that if they had the chance, they should've taken him into custody rather than put two bullets in his head.

derkderpderp
May 13th, 2011, 11:41 AM
Im not the type of person who thinks anyone deserves death for it is the unknown and maybe its good? BUT Osama Bin Laden was a despicable excuse of a so called Muslim, thanks to him and his stupid propaganda wars, and backwards wifebeating way of thinking, he killed innocent people supposedly in the name of Islam, and due to him being such a backwards prick, he gave Muslims everywhere a bad fucking name.
As ive been brought up as a Muslim and im constantly around other Muslims i can confidently say that bin flipping laden killing innocent people isnt justified islamically, and he was not a muslim, neither is the goddamn al qaeda, he deserved death, good riddance!