View Full Version : [UK] £650million to aid pakistan
Revolution
April 9th, 2011, 10:49 PM
http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01287/ragout-682_1287374a.jpg
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3513530/UKs-650m-grant-to-Pakistans-education-system-risks-being-spent-on-IMAGINARY-schools.html
What do you think? Is it justified considering our own encomny?
Amnesiac
April 9th, 2011, 11:07 PM
I don't think it appropriate for a government to give large sums of money to other nations and then announce enormous spending cuts domestically because they "can't afford it".
Sith Lord 13
April 10th, 2011, 02:13 AM
I don't think it appropriate for a government to give large sums of money to other nations and then announce enormous spending cuts domestically because they "can't afford it".
This.
Azunite
April 10th, 2011, 03:26 AM
Agreed with Justin
Craig1995
April 10th, 2011, 04:19 AM
Typical conservatives the cuts affect the poor more than the rich so he dosent give a toss.
amazing they had to let off nurses that only get paid about £20k a year but they can afford to just give money away. Like usuall we allready helped to bail out Ireland and Greece as if we've got the money to.
embers
April 10th, 2011, 06:08 AM
I don't know why the fuck Cameron is helping us. The government have proved themselves time and time again that they are incapable of enforcing ANYTHING. Sure, it's good my country are getting money, but you know what, it's probably going to go into the ISI's involvement in Afghanistan or into finding out how much sugar the Indian PM puts in his fucking tea.
Zazu
April 10th, 2011, 06:29 AM
£650 million in fiat currency. No intrinsic value whatsoever. Money created from thin air.
All a fucking joke if you ask me.
MadManWithaBox
April 10th, 2011, 07:04 AM
Shit prime minister, from a shit goverment, doing a shit thing? Wow.
Peace God
April 10th, 2011, 07:20 AM
£650 million in fiat currency. No intrinsic value whatsoever. Money created from thin air.
All a fucking joke if you ask me.
Here ya go tutz, buy yourself something nice.;)
Syvelocin
April 10th, 2011, 12:38 PM
Shit prime minister, from a shit goverment, doing a shit thing? Wow.
Precisely. Who expected anything different? I assume I'm not the only one who regrets Cameron then, Matt? :P
MadManWithaBox
April 10th, 2011, 01:00 PM
Precisely. Who expected anything different? I assume I'm not the only one who regrets Cameron then, Matt? :P
Did anyone really want Cameron? If people really wanted him, they would of clearly voted him in, not in this coalition bollocks. All this is is Cameron trying to make it seem like Britain is still a big boy by giving away money we don't have, and knowing full well he's damaging the country because. The only thing he doesn't probably doesn't know in fact, is that everyone else knows.
kai99
April 10th, 2011, 01:28 PM
I don't think it appropriate for a government to give large sums of money to other nations and then announce enormous spending cuts domestically because they "can't afford it".
Totally agree with you
scuba steve
April 10th, 2011, 01:57 PM
Did anyone really want Cameron? If people really wanted him, they would of clearly voted him in, not in this coalition bollocks. All this is is Cameron trying to make it seem like Britain is still a big boy by giving away money we don't have, and knowing full well he's damaging the country because. The only thing he doesn't probably doesn't know in fact, is that everyone else knows.
I still think Gordon Brown would have performed better than Cameron and Clegg.
MadManWithaBox
April 10th, 2011, 04:42 PM
Well yeah. I mean labour, and Brown, were just the scapegoats. The way people talk you'd think labour was responsible for the entire recession, but thats rubbish. Those cuts would have had to come anyway, regardless of who was in power, its just labours bad luck they were. The only really bad thing labour was responsible for was the MP expenses thing. But that wasn't a massive thing really, it was just bad timing.
scuba steve
April 10th, 2011, 04:59 PM
Well yeah. I mean labour, and Brown, were just the scapegoats. The way people talk you'd think labour was responsible for the entire recession, but thats rubbish. Those cuts would have had to come anyway, regardless of who was in power, its just labours bad luck they were. The only really bad thing labour was responsible for was the MP expenses thing. But that wasn't a massive thing really, it was just bad timing.
Brown was a bad Public representative, he did a good job as Tony Blairs Chancellor. Since he didn't have the charisma to defend himself, everything was easily pinned on him and his party.
MadManWithaBox
April 11th, 2011, 03:12 AM
Which is precisely the point. It was just bad timing, the MP expenses scandal coinciding with the 'credit crunch' so everyone pointed at labour. It doesn't matter who won, the cuts would be the same, except we'd have a better PM than that idiot Cameron. He should be focusing on domestic, rather than trying to make it seem like Britain is still a superpower, or even matters.
Magus
April 11th, 2011, 04:43 AM
Don't do this. We are poor and needy people, yar.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3423/3308587075_24d2f4a771_m.jpg
scuba steve
April 11th, 2011, 03:28 PM
Don't do this. We are poor and needy people, yar.
image (http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3423/3308587075_24d2f4a771_m.jpg)
You're from Mother F'ing Kuwait!!! It's richer than the UK right now :P
Magus
April 11th, 2011, 04:34 PM
You're from Mother F'ing Kuwait!!! It's richer than the UK right now :P
I am from the Baluchistan province of Pakistan/Iran. I live in Kuwait as a complete stranger. I am an alien to those oil people. We are but servants, drivers, cooks, trash collecters in their eyes.
scuba steve
April 11th, 2011, 05:12 PM
I am from the Baluchistan province of Pakistan/Iran. I live in Kuwait as a complete stranger. I am an alien to those oil people. We are but servants, drivers, cooks, trash collecters in their eyes.
I watched a documentry on Kuwait and it's rise to becoming peaceful oil distributors and how they've became the most obese country in the world and hiring those outside the country as essentially servents. Is this to pay fees for further education? Also just wait until their oil reserves dry up, give it no more than 50 years and your children can take over as fat camp representatives as the now impoverished obese need to lose the weight through diminishing government funding so they can go back to the hard labour they were used to only a few years ago!
embers
April 12th, 2011, 07:25 PM
I am an alien to those oil people. We are but servants, drivers, cooks, trash collecters in their eyes.
That's way better than being "secretly" murdered by the Pakistani government on the grounds of being Balochi.
TheMatrix
April 16th, 2011, 01:21 AM
image (http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01287/ragout-682_1287374a.jpg)
What do you think? Is it justified considering our own encomny?
no no no!!!!!
jason_smitty
April 16th, 2011, 11:17 AM
I don't think it appropriate for a government to give large sums of money to other nations and then announce enormous spending cuts domestically because they "can't afford it".
totally agree with this post
MadManWithaBox
April 16th, 2011, 01:29 PM
Hence my statement - Cameron is a bad prime minister.
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.