Virtual Teen Forums
 

Go Back   Virtual Teen Forums > >
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 27th, 2006, 06:22 PM   #21
0=
Gone...
 
0='s Forum Picture
 
Join Date: May 5, 2006
Gender: Male
Default Re: The Nuclear Issue

Much of the methane is released by the cows raised to feed you, stop eating cows, you lower the methane level considerably, I'm not sure about the NOx. If we get off of coal power completely, we can push back the negative effects of global warming many years, possibly long enough to finish the development of fusion. It is already within our means to produce power using nuclear fusion, it is simply too expensive, if the government would fund fusion rather than war then it would become affordable, thus providing infinite energy due to the massive quantities of hydrogen. A fusion plant could be entirely self-sustaining by diverting some of the energy to electrolosiys to produce more hydrogen. In fact, with this infinite energy, you would be able to produce enough hydrogen to run our cars, boats, abnd aircraft off of hydrogen with only minor changes to internal combustion engines. Hydrogen releases very few pollutants campared to petroleum products when burned because it is very pure, and since it burns at a higher temperature you could go further on less hydrogen, combine this with hybrid technology and 200 mpg is easily achieveable. The only waste product from the fusion of hydrogen is helium, which could easily be collected and later fused into a heavier element, and/or used in balloons and blimps.
0= is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 27th, 2006, 06:26 PM   #22
Melchi0r
Awesome Poster
 
Melchi0r's Forum Picture
 
Join Date: February 22, 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Default Re: The Nuclear Issue

The invention of the atomic bomb (Albert Einstein's one mistake) and other nuclear weapons were bad things to happen to the world. While there are nukes there can never be true peace, while even while countries are at peace, a disagreement could break out and the fact that there are nukes makes it extremely tense.

Please Click Here... you know you want to.

Only hyms upon your lips...
Melchi0r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 27th, 2006, 10:40 PM   #23
Whisper
Ancient Gmod
 
Whisper's Forum Picture
 
Name: Kodie
Join Date: June 30, 2004
Location: Van Island, BC
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Blog Entries: 4
Default Re: The Nuclear Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by Panic! View Post
The invention of the atomic bomb (Albert Einstein's one mistake) and other nuclear weapons were bad things to happen to the world. While there are nukes there can never be true peace, while even while countries are at peace, a disagreement could break out and the fact that there are nukes makes it extremely tense.
Your wrong
the invention was anything but a mistake what happened was not his fault to blaim it on him is ludacris
The nuclear bombs are providing peace what do you think the chances of the USSR invading America would have been without them?

Nuclear energy is extremly clean
Every electronic device emits low levels of radiation
medical devices like Xrays MRI's CT's emmit high levels of radiation
Radiation therapy is used in fighting cancer
radioactive isotopes are used in testing (the Koo-laid)

Radiation and nuclear reactions are what power our sun
and every single star
scientists even belive that at the earths core theres a natural occouring reactor thats keeping earths EM feild strong

Saying that this scientis commited a horrible act is like saying an ancient chinese scientst who invented gun powder was a horrible man
because without it we wouldnt have guns or cannons

or whoever invented the ability to forge metal and created the first sword

nuclear energy is a WONDERFUL thing
Nuclear deturants ARE what has prevented WWIII

Your all severly brainwashed
you hate and fear what you dont understand
its sad
Whisper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 28th, 2006, 10:53 AM   #24
Sapphire
Tears & Smiles
 
Sapphire's Forum Picture
 
Join Date: March 22, 2005
Location: UK
Gender: Female
Blog Entries: 3
Default Re: The Nuclear Issue

How can the invention of nuclear bombs be a good thing? The same goes for missiles, guns, rockets, torpedoes and such arms that have made the killing of one or hundreds or thousands of people by pressing a button or pulling a trigger. War is now far too impersonal. Thousands can die because one person pushed one button. It is so disgusting that we have got to this point.


~ The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step ~

* Nothing in the world has ever been accomplished without passion *
Sapphire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 28th, 2006, 03:03 PM   #25
Whisper
Ancient Gmod
 
Whisper's Forum Picture
 
Name: Kodie
Join Date: June 30, 2004
Location: Van Island, BC
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Blog Entries: 4
Default Re: The Nuclear Issue

no though I do find your....innocence refreshing
This is bound to happen with tecnological advancements we are able to save millions hell billions it has allowed us to become the dominant species on this planet
that same rocket tecnology has allowed us to leave our world
to begin exploration of the stars
That same nuclear tecnology has allowed us to develop radiation sheilds for use in medical labratorsy, hospitals, spcae craft, nuclear power plants it has allowed us to develop cancer fighting treatments, extremly vital and effective instruments to test patients
That same gun powder was invented for fireworks, thats what it was used for in ancient china

what you dont seem to grasp is ANY invention can be used as a weapon
I could kill you with a fork
like seriously
What can be used to create, can also destroy
this is fundamental fact of reality
which path is chosen depends on the weilder

You have so little faith in your fellow man
your species as a whole
Humanity has made mistakes but we also have created many wonders

As for your disgust towards war
I agree it is not something to be takin lightly
nor should nuclear weapons be used
in ALL of humanitys history only two have been
Your English
From Britian your entire land was forged in the fires of war
From Roman ocupation, the saxxons, rival tribes, the irish, the scottish, the french, communists, nazis, etc.........

Was it not worth it?
Is the United Kingdom not a strong and free country?

Evil prevails when great men refuse to act
war is part of being human
we fight for what we belive in
we fight to protect those we love
we fight for our freedom
We fight for our children

I would NEVER have it any other way

Nuclear energy is a wonderful thing
it was a wonderful invention that has the potental of saving millions
slowing global warming, providing abundant energy, saving millions through medical advancements, and providing the consistat and large amounts of energy required for humanity to travel the stars

As for your motion that war is impersonal
you cannot possibly be more wrong
war can never be impersonal EVER
the fact that your sitting here screaming it is shows how little you know
and how young at heart you really are
you dont understand


As for this debate you've gone from ripping my face off with the whole NUCLEAR THINGYS ARE BAD!!!!!!!!! to saying every single weapon ever invented is a horrible thing and that it never should have happened and that we should all have just always lived in freedoma dn peace and dammit i want my unicorn!

dosent work like that
so either get back to debating about nuclear energy as a whole and actually SHOW ME FACTS to prove your theory that everything to do with it is horrible and no good has ever or will ever come of it
I have given you facts repetedly throughout my argument
you havent given me ANYTHING but opinions
Whisper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2006, 03:53 PM   #26
JJJ
Junior Member+
 
Join Date: December 1, 2006
Location: Near London in England unfortuneatly
Gender: Female
Default Re: The Nuclear Issue

Countries make nukes to feel important. I say everyone sholud destroy them and not make no mor but the chances of that hapening are nil.
JJJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2006, 04:00 PM   #27
Hyper
VT Lover
 
Join Date: July 3, 2006
Location: Glacier
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Default Re: The Nuclear Issue

Ohh lol I forgot to post ages ago

But look at the list of countries who confirmed it

Japan
China
USA

I'm tough, rough, ready and able
To pick myself up from under this table
Don't stick no sign on me, I got no label
I'm a little sick, unsure, unsound and unstable

But I'm fighting my way back
Hyper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13th, 2007, 10:48 AM   #28
theonetheycallbob
Junior Member+
 
Join Date: November 27, 2006
Location: B-Town, USA
Age: 26
Default Re: The Nuclear Issue

okay, first of all we would NEVER get every country to destroy nukes. North Korea for example would be like yeah okay, and then burry them all until everyone else's are gone and then they would go on a destroy the world rampage. Whether this makes since or not, Nukes hold the world together. With out them we would be fine but now that they exist everyone knows their place and thats just the way it is. No if's and's or but's. (No offense to any one but its the truth)
theonetheycallbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13th, 2007, 03:24 PM   #29
0=
Gone...
 
0='s Forum Picture
 
Join Date: May 5, 2006
Gender: Male
Default Re: The Nuclear Issue

Sadly it will remain that way until we have plasma cannons orbiting the Earth, then those will be the new nukes.
0= is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16th, 2007, 08:45 PM   #30
fdsgfg55465
Member++
 
fdsgfg55465's Forum Picture
 
Join Date: October 18, 2005
Location: florida, usa
Default Re: The Nuclear Issue

i think USA is the most likely country to use nukes i mean we already used them twice, i think everyone should get rid of them or the world will fall to a nuclear society
fdsgfg55465 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 16th, 2007, 08:50 PM   #31
Bankai15
Nice Poster
 
Bankai15's Forum Picture
 
Join Date: December 1, 2006
Location: In a underground location in Memphis
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Default Re: The Nuclear Issue

We will not use nuclear bombs unless we are forced to and it would have to be a very big threat if we would even concider fireing a nuclear projectile.
And we should never have to use them at all unless a nuke was shot at us.

JACOB
Bankai15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 20th, 2007, 11:48 PM   #32
DimShady
Unregistered
 
Default Re: Patriotism

Quote:
Originally Posted by 0= View Post
We should all destroy our nukes.


As much as I hate the U.S., that would be suicide. We would be invaded in a second.
  Reply With Quote
Old January 21st, 2007, 12:23 AM   #33
DimShady
Unregistered
 
Default Re: The Nuclear Issue

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreedomFighter14 View Post
We will not use nuclear bombs unless we are forced to and it would have to be a very big threat if we would even concider fireing a nuclear projectile.
And we should never have to use them at all unless a nuke was shot at us.
1953: U.S. overthrows Prime Minister Mossadeq of Iran.
U.S. installs Shah as dictator.


1954: U.S. overthrows democratically-elected President Arbenz of Guatemala.
200,000 civillians killed.


1963: U.S. backs assasination of South Vietnamese President Diem.


1963-1975: American military kills 4 million people in Southeast Asia.


1973: U.S. stages coup in Chile. Democratically-elected President Salvador Allende assasinated. Dictatator Augusto Pinochet installed, 5,000 Chileans murdered.

1977: U.S. backs military rulers of El Salvedor. 70,000 Salvadorans and four American nuns killed.

1980's: U.S. trains Osama Bin Laden and fellow terrorists to kill Soviets. CIA gives them $3 billion.

1981: Reagan administration trainds and funds "contras." 30,000 Nicaraguans die.

1982: U.S. provides billions in aid to Saddam Hussein for weapons to kill Iranians.

1983: White House gives Iran weapons to kill Iraqis.

1989: CIA agent Manuel Noreiga (also serving as President of Panama) disobeys orders from Washington. U.S. invades Panama and removes Noriega. 3,000 Panamanian civillian causalties.

1990: Iraq invades Kuwait with weapons from U.S.

1991: U.S. enters Iraq. Bush reinstates dictator of Kuwait.

1998: Clinton bombs "weapons factory" in Sudan. Factory turns out to be making Aspirin.

1991 to present: American planes bomb Iraq on a daily basis. U.N. estimates 500,000 Iraqi children die from bombing and sanctions.

2000-01: U.S. gives Taliban-ruled Afghanistan $245 million in "aid."

Sept. 11, 2001: Osama bin Laden uses his CIA training to murder 3,000 people.


Tell me exactly how we where "forced" to do that, dipshit.
  Reply With Quote
Old January 21st, 2007, 07:34 AM   #34
Hyper
VT Lover
 
Join Date: July 3, 2006
Location: Glacier
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Default Re: The Nuclear Issue

See it exactly works like the events describe it, the US doesnt invade to save people, it invades and interfiers for its OWN benefit. They dont give a shit about their 'principals' anyway.. Your claim is retarded.. If anoyone would attack the US theyd have to deal with a great military power.. And the fact that US is defended by their geography.

I'm tough, rough, ready and able
To pick myself up from under this table
Don't stick no sign on me, I got no label
I'm a little sick, unsure, unsound and unstable

But I'm fighting my way back
Hyper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright©2000 - 2018
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2018, VirtualTeen.org