Originally Posted by Burning Star I
If you're going to be like that, how about this:
We have a conundrum. We can't say there is a god because we have no proof, we cant say their isn't because we have no proof to prove otherwise.
Although the latter is astronomically more likely then a divine being forming our lives and the universe.
I didn't get you at all. What are you trying to say exactly?
"We can't say there is a god because we have no proof - of God's existence" I added the extension, that would be the same, argument from ignorance.
And the same applies to the next one. You have just paraphrased it.
And some people tend to equate that to "Proving a negative".
You want to read this: CLICK ME!
, or better yet this: CLICK ME 2!