View Single Post
Old June 19th, 2006, 01:25 PM  
kolte
I am: I am
 
kolte's Forum Picture
 
Name: Matt
Join Date: May 31, 2005
Location: usa
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Default Re: bann on public smoking

You guys. Are you serious? Your argument is forever flawed. You are all being hypocritical (spelling?). You argue that you are against second hand smoke because of its health risk, but you don't look at the hundreds of other products sold in the US and other countires that are twice + as harmful. Carcenogenes found in cig's can also be located in water, mcdonalds burgers, tissue paper, automobile smog, and well....everything in the world has...some carcenogenes (cancer causing material). So blame the lung cancer and heart disease on cig's but unfortunatly these illnessess can also be the cause of the america life style. Laziness, and ill food habits. I'm sorry, but don't expect to live past 40 if you eat shitty food every day. Don't expect to live past thrity if your watching telivison for over 5 hours in one sitting. Or if you sit in front of the computer for prolonged peridos. McDonalds, Burger King, Wal-Mart, Dollar Store, and the Mini Mart, Quickstop is not going to mold you into a super model. It will only contribute to your obesity, or your heart condition, or your lung failute. Stop putting all this attention on smoking when its not the problem. I laied down facts. Japan, the largest smoking population percentage of any countries in the planet, but also some of the loest lung cancer and heart disease numbers of any country on the planet. What does this conclude at least to me? It tells me, and you too, that while smoking is not healthy, at least in the United States the number of deaths in relation to smoking are highly exaggerated. In fact, I wouldnt be suprised if they have been stretched by as much as 300000 deaths per year. So yeah, smoking is bad, hell, it kills and hurts people. But if you eliminate it, your not saving yoruself. Your not helping the numbers of death. Your anti smoking capainges have lowered the number of smokers greatly. From what, something near 60% in the 50's 60's to now about 30% 40%. So, in relation to the population....less people as a % should be dying of lung cancer and heart disease right. Well, it just so happens that more people are dying of lung cancer and heart disease in relation to a percentage of the population. So you loose. Not because I win, but because you cant prove your case....I can prove mine. Who cant say that cig's are harmful. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure that one out. But to prove how harmful they arent....that takes class lol.


""The New Law of Righteousness," that there "shall be no buying or selling, no fairs nor markets, but the whole earth shall be a common treasury for every man," and "there shall be none Lord over others, but every one shall be a Lord of himself.""
kolte is offline   Reply With Quote