Originally Posted by Deschain
Outside is irrelevent, but to answer, no, it would not matter as much if at all in other contexts. We, however, are not in other contexts, and so proof is necessary.
What kind of proof is necessary, given this sort of debate?
Proof is necessary if there is a way to provide objective proof. If not, then although it may not be a logical debate, it'd be illogical and pointless to ask for proof when it's given there's no way to attain the proof in a reliable and valid manner.
"That is my ambition, to have killed more people, more helpless people, than any man or woman who has ever lived." - Jane Toppan
"There's a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow, it's just a son of a bitch getting there" - Sully Erna of Godsmack