Originally Posted by nyyanks97
I read your posts, which is a translation of the Torah.
It's the translation that is generally agreed on by the commentators, by the way. But that's only a small
part of my point. I'm questioning your belief that the commentators have the right to say what is and what isn't literal. How can you and the commentators have the audacity to decide what is and isn't literal from books orated from god itself? Hm?