View Single Post
Old October 9th, 2006, 08:39 PM  
Nice Poster
*Dissident*'s Forum Picture
Join Date: March 20, 2006
Location: Tullahoma, TN
Age: 26
Gender: Undisclosed
Default Re: Question for conspiracy therorists

Originally Posted by cmpcmp View Post
i KINDA missed a lot of the stuff that happened earlier but i skimmed it.

It seems that this borad might be a "post ur music (hippy) and quotes (hippy) here" board. Some thing being supported by celebrites or artist doesn't make it rights or wrong.

-What do you propose the world should have done against Nazism? (IE. Germany, and Japan(not technicaly nazi, but still the same idea))
-If we wouldn't have opposed Communist russia do you think that they would have played nice?
-Are you opposed to in intervention in Darfur, and would you have been against an intervention in Rwanda?

If you belive that in no situation can peace be achieved through military means then... well let the ppl of darfur die, and the rwandans rot....

If you read up on the bombings in germany, many of them were taken to court as military crimes. 10's of thousands of people died, without warning, and they were almost completely civilians. In japan, the same thing. we bombed the shit out of their most populated cities. More people died in tokyo (100,000) than either of the nuke attacks in hiroshima or nagasaki, but no one ever mentions it because it wasnt nukes. hundreds of thousands of innocent germans died in germany, but no one talks about it because they werent nukes. And what for? what FOR!? there was no real reason. we wanted to scare the shit out of the germans, but instead, we fried them.

Communist russia, eh? well, we didnt do anything, now did we? im not opposed to having defenses, no. but nuclear weapons arent defenses. bombs arent defenses. you cant stop an invasion with bombs. Bombs destroy cities, destroy lives, destroy worlds. The cold war was still cold. it came close to global annihilation, you know. Cuban Missle Crisis, whew. In the case of nuclear weapons, you CANT bomb to peace, and you WILL bomb to pieces. as simple as that. had we started that war, the entire earth would have been decimated, all surface life destroyed. at least kennedy was reasonable.

I cant really say anything about Darfur or Rwanda. if i tried, i would make a fool of myself because i dont know anything of the situation there.

The reasoning that you can use a weapon of destruction to garner peace is, imo folley. Peace does not come from violence, peace comes from tolerance and forgiveness and love. Nazi Germany was a real threat to the saftey of the world. Facism is still a problem today. they had enough rescources to take over the world, and we knew it. but the bombing of their innocent cities was wrong. War is sometimes innevitable. but we should be as careful with the enemies lives as we would our own. we are all Gods children, no matter what you think God is, he "made" us. Have respect and love for your neighbor, says Jesus. Amen to that.

you can bomb the world to pieces
but you cant bomb it into peace

life is to short to make just on decision. musics to loud for just one station. love is to big for just one nation, and God is to big for just one religion

Come visit my diary, War is Hell!
*Dissident* is offline